GoPlus Challenges THORChain’s Decentralization Claims Over DPRK-Linked Fund Flows GoPlus Security argued that THORChain should not compare itself directly with Bitcoin or Ethereum when defending its inability to block illicit flows. It said THORChain outbounds rely on threshold signatures from a relatively small active validator set, while the protocol already includes pause, per-chain signing halt and governance mechanisms. GoPlus pointed to prior intervention during THORChain’s own exploit and argued that FBI- or OFAC-attributed DPRK-linked funds could be blocked under the protocol’s existing emergency framework.
Source: Wu Blockchain
Source: Wu Blockchain
Related Articles
- GoPlus Security Questions THORChain's Decentralization Amid DPRK-Linked Fund Transfers
- THORChain responds to criticism over "handling hacker funds": a decentralized, permissionless protocol cannot refuse
- Slow Fog's Yuxian Critiques THORChain's Response to Security Incidents
- THORChain Addresses Security Concerns Following Bitget Incident
- AMLBot Traces About 4 BTC From Bitget Hack Into Wasabi CoinJoinCrypto compliance and blockchain...
.